In the News

From Immortality to Ugly People: 100-Year-Old Predictions About 2025

Akron Beacon Journal | By Mark J. Price

Nearly 100 years ago, a group of deep thinkers dared to imagine what life would be like in 2025. Some of their prophecies were completely off target, while others proved to be weirdly accurate. [Including:]

  • The future looked ugly to Albert E. Wiggam, an American psychologist. According to his calculations, homely, dull people were having more children than beautiful, intelligent people. “If we keep progressing in the wrong direction, as we have been doing, American beauty is bound to decline and there won’t be a good-looking girl to be found 100 years from now,” he told an audience in Brooklyn, New York. Looking around the auditorium, he added: “However, this lack is not apparent yet, especially here in Brooklyn.”
  • Thanks to science, people would live to be 150 years old... The advances of medicine and surgery will have been such that most of the ailments and limitations of old age will have been eliminated. Life will be prolonged at its maximum of efficiency until death comes like sunset, and is met without pain and without reluctance. There will be no death from disease, and almost any sort of injury will be curable.
  • In a hundred years, there will not be numerous nations, but only three great masses of people — the United States of America, the United States of Europe and China.
  • The earth will be under one government, and one language will be written and understood, or even spoken, all over the globe.
  • People would use a pocket-sized apparatus for communications to see and hear each other without being in the same room.
  • Horse-drawn vehicles are fast disappearing from our streets, but jackass-driven automobiles will still be with us 100 years from now.

Read Full Article

 

Thinking of our Members, Colleagues, Patients, Loved Ones, and First Responders Affected by the SoCal Fires

Coalition for Compassionate Care of California | By Moore Ballentine

The staff of CCCC are watching as the Palisades, Eaton, Hurst, and other fires ravage Southern California. Our hearts and thoughts are with all affected. Here are a few tangible ways you can help, even at this early stage.

Donate to:

As always, in the early stages of a disaster, cash donations are more helpful than supplies or efforts to volunteer. That said, Pasadena Humane is asking for both donations (give at pasadenahumane.org/wildfirerelief) and specific supplies to help shelter animals displaced by the fire: pet food and water bowls, extra large crates, and blankets. Drop off supplies at 361 S. Raymond Avenue, Pasadena.

For information and updates, here are some helpful links, courtesy of the California Department of Aging:

Editor's note: Thank you, Coalition for Compassionate Care of California for equipping so many with this crucial information! Readers of our newsletter, please distribute and encourage your networks to support these relief efforts. Ongoing, our newsletter will be posting ways you can specifically help hospice and palliative care in these tragically impacted service areas. Please email relevant stories with URL links to [email protected]. We send support to all persons affected! 

 

Home Health OASIS Submission Requirements for All Patients, HHQRP Resources

Alliance Daily | Jan. 9, 2025

Effective January 1, 2025, home health agencies could voluntarily begin submitting OASIS data for all patients regardless of payer. The collection and submission of the OASIS for all patients becomes mandatory July 1, 2025.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) removed the temporary suspension of the OASIS data collection on non-Medicare/non-Medicaid home health agency patients through the CY2023 Home Health Prospective Payment System Rate Update final rule and updated the removal in the CY2025 Home Health Prospective Payment System Rate Update final rule. With these changes, patients who have received home care services of more than one visit in a quality episode provided by all Medicare-certified home health agencies and Medicaid home health providers in states where those agencies are required to meet the Medicare Home Health Conditions of Participation, are eligible for OASIS data collection and submission. 

There are no changes to patients excluded which are those under the age of 18, those receiving only maternity services, and those receiving only chore, housekeeping or personal care services. As stated above, there is a voluntary period prior to the mandatory implementation date of July 1, 2025.

There are many questions about the revised requirement which CMS has addressed in a Q&A document. CMS has also released a Fact Sheet and provided guidance on the provision of the OASIS privacy notice. Specifically, effective January 1, 2025 HHAs should only provide patients with the CMS Privacy Act Statement and Attachment A – Statement of Patient Privacy Rights.  Attachment C – Notice About Privacy for Patients Who Don’t Have Medicare or Medicaid should not be provided to patients. These forms are available on the Home Health Agency Center webpage in the OASIS section. Both documents are available in English and Spanish.

In addition to these OASIS resources, CMS has also posted updated introductory courses to the Home Health Quality Reporting Program (HHQRP). This series of courses is helpful for those new to the HHQRP as well as those interested in a refresher.

 

What Covid Tried to Teach us — and Why it Will Matter in the Next Pandemic

Stat News | By Helen Branswell
 
Five years ago this week, STAT was interviewing nervous infectious disease scientists about a mysterious disease spreading in the central Chinese city of Wuhan, located roughly 500 miles west of Shanghai. On Jan. 4, 2020, we published the first of what would become a torrent of articles on the disease now known as Covid-19. 

The intervening years have both sped and crawled by, too busy at times to take stock of all that has changed, too plodding to believe we have arrived at this anniversary already. (The first case of Covid in the U.S., in a person who had traveled to Wuhan, was not confirmed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention until Jan. 20, 2020.)
What do we have to show for the time that has passed? Not enough.

There’s a saying attributed to all sorts of people that one shouldn’t waste a good crisis. In public health, especially, learning from disease outbreaks and environmental disasters is critical; figuring out what worked and what didn’t is fundamental to emergency response planning for the next time. Much as we all might hate the idea, the fact remains that there will be more pandemics. We cannot wish them away and we imperil ourselves if we do not prepare for them. Already, there are renewed concerns about the potential for an H5N1 flu pandemic, with the virus tearing through U.S. dairy cow herds over the past year and also infecting at least 66 people in this country, most of them workers exposed to infected cows or poultry. 

And yet there haven’t been the types of post-mortems or after-action inquiries that normally follow an event of the magnitude of the Covid pandemic. In 2021 a group of experts in public health, science, and other fields began to lay the groundwork for what they thought would be an independent commission looking into the handling of Covid. When the Biden administration decided not to appoint such a body, the group turned its work into a book that was published in the spring of 2023. “They didn’t have an agenda in mind. They could not articulate even to themselves internally as to how the system should change,” the lead author, Phillip Zelikow, said at the time of the administration’s decision to forgo an inquiry.

We appear to be trying to teach ourselves the lessons of Covid the hard way. 
So as we ruminate on the fact that a half-decade has passed since Covid entered our world, here are some thoughts about things we will likely have to deal with when the next pandemic hits — realities that can be traced back directly to the Covid experience.
Public trust in public health institutions has cratered

The CDC has long been the world’s preeminent public health agency. It’s not a coincidence the Chinese, European, and African equivalents are called China CDC, the ECDC, and the Africa CDC. But at the beginning of the Covid pandemic, when the United States was trying to identify newly infected individuals to limit transmission, a test devised by the CDC — the only one in use at the time — failed. Mistakes happen, but that was a bad mistake to make at a very bad time to make it. A successful test would not have stopped Covid. But the unsuccessful test made the CDC look inept just when the country turned to it to chart the path forward.

Later, messaging from officials at the CDC and elsewhere in the government discouraged the public from wearing masks, in part — though this was not generally acknowledged out loud — to preserve scarce supplies for health care workers who were forced to reuse disposable surgical masks for days on end because hospitals couldn’t replace them. Then the guidance shifted and people were urged to mask up even out of doors, with the CDC’s website offering instructions on how to make a mask using hair elastics and T-shirt fabric. A surreal read even back in 2020, those instructions can still be found in the agency’s online archives

Read Full Article
 

How the DOGE Agenda Could Impact Medicaid, Veterans' Healthcare

Fierce Healthcare / By Noah Tong 

Axes and chainsaws, not butter knives and chisels.

That’s how Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) commission co-chair Vivek Ramaswamy describes the approach he and world’s richest man Elon Musk will take to reducing the size of the federal government.

Musk has said he wants $2 trillion slashed from the budget, a figure that borders on ambition and an impossibility depending on who you ask. Benefits to Medicaid could be on the chopping block.

The duo outlined their goals in a Wall Street Journal op-ed. DOGE will work with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to rescind regulations and cut costs, they say, on the belief that recent court cases give them authority to reverse prior executive overreach under other administrations.

They also want to reduce the head count of federal employees at agencies by skirting civil service protection norms, mandate in-person work (with support from some senators and despite union pushback) and move agencies out of Washington, D.C.

Lastly, Musk and Ramaswamy intends to “take aim” at unauthorized spending from Congress to eliminate funds to Planned Parenthood. If possible, Trump and co. are looking to sidestep the 1974 Impoundment Control Act, which ensures a president cannot refuse to release congressionally appropriated funds to programs. The strategy to fight impoundment law in the court system is endorsed by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

Lawmakers fluctuate on how they hope to accomplish the DOGE’s plans. Some say entitlement programs like Medicare and Medicaid won’t be touched, while others make no such promises. Outgoing Rep. Michael Burgess, R-Texas, suggested the DOGE eliminate redundant departments (PDF) within the the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

Fierce Healthcare took a closer look at the healthcare implications of the DOGE and recent comments made by Ramaswamy and other Republicans on Medicaid and veterans’ care.

Healthcare for veterans 

On Nov. 13, just over one week after the presidential election, Ramaswamy denounced expired government programs that account for $516 billion each year.

“There are 1,200+ programs that are no longer authorized but still receive appropriations,” he said on X. “This is totally nuts. We can & should save hundreds of billions each year by defunding government programs that Congress no longer authorizes. We’ll challenge any politician who disagrees to defend the other side.”

Top of the list of these programs is the Veterans’ Health Care Eligibility Reform Act of 1996, costing the government $119 billion a year. This law continues to self-authorize and receive discretionary funding each year through spending bills. The law expired in 1998 but continues to provide medical benefits to veterans today.

Does Ramaswamy actually want to de-fund this program, which has the potential to be politically devastating to his party?...

Medicaid 

If the DOGE and the Trump administration are looking for cuts wherever they can find them in the $6.75 trillion federal budget, and all of discretionary funding accounts for $1.7 trillion, they will have to look toward Social Security, Medicare or Medicaid for further action.

Ramaswamy is leaving the door open to reform Medicare and Medicaid by eliminating waste and fraud through program integrity measures, reported multiple news publications. He has also called on reducing duplicative payments for individuals enrolled in Medicare Advantage and veterans’ healthcare.

Republicans could be shy to cut benefits to Medicare and Medicaid, but lawmakers seem to be keeping an open mind. Rep. Ralph Norman, R-South Carolina, said “nothing is sacrosanct” following a closed doors DOGE meeting with Musk and Ramaswamy in early December. Other lawmakers—like Reps. Brett Guthrie of Kentucky and Mark Alford of Missouri, as well as Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky, John Cornyn of Texas and Chuck Grassley of Iowa—say various options of federal program reforms are possible.

Cuts to Medicaid could be pushed in one or two big reconciliation packages where only a simple majority is needed, said Kristin Wikelius, chief program officer at United States of Care, a think tank advancing expanded health access. Medicaid policies will likely mirror Trump’s first term. 

There is likely to be return to work requirements for state Medicaid programs, said Eric Levine, associate principal at Avalere. Those requirements normally look different on a state-by-state basis

“You can see redder states implementing them as a way to reduce enrollment for a populations who would be deemed able to work and to not divert resources from the traditional Medicaid population,” he explained…

Read Full Article

 
<< first < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > last >>

Page 6 of 133